A simple guide to understanding how ADI and MDM relate and when to use each (or both) solutions
The exponential growth of data underscores its significance as a fundamental asset in today's world. Professionals working with data have access to a vast array of tools. When users confront the common issue of managing overlapping, fragmented records and addressing various data quality issues, they often opt for Master Data Management (MDM). However, it's crucial to recognize that MDM isn't the exclusive solution available and that it's often not the best suited solution available.
MDM as a concept focuses on the creation and ongoing management of “golden records” in a centralized system. This all-encompassing approach often comes with a high cost - in time, money, and people, but can yield clean data assets to operate on. While MDM seems like the “perfect” solution, we routinely see and hear the pain from MDM practitioners and top executives across many industries on the limitations of their MDM platform or of MDM in general.
Overall, MDM is not the answer for everything. Here is a quick list of well established pro’s and con’s of typical MDM solutions:
ADI is a no-code, AI-driven entity resolution platform that data citizens, not just domain experts, can leverage to combine data quickly to make it actionable. While there are many challenges to using messy data, we created ADI to solve the first and most significant challenge faced by consumers of data - simply and reliably linking records to one another; otherwise known as entity resolution.
Great question - based upon our discussions with top data executives, experience as practitioners, and research in the field, we’ve put together the following matrix to help understand when you might want each solution - or both!